Ergi Kirkin vs Giulio Perego Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Jul at 01:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Kirkin vs G. Perego

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kirkin 1 - 0 Perego
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ergi Kirkin winning 2 and Giulio Perego winning 1. The last match between Ergi Kirkin and Giulio Perego was at the M15 Segrate, 23-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ergi Kirkin getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kirkin | 1 |
| Perego | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Segrate(07-23-25)
E. Kirkin vs G. Perego H2H Profile
E. Kirkin vs G. Perego Match Preview:
- In the past six months, Perego has a second serve point win rate of 50%, superior to Kirkin's 42.11%. Is this a critical stat for match predictions? Yes, it often correlates highly with match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Kirkin edges out slightly, winning 44.73% versus Perego's 44.44%. However, Perego excels in returning first serves, with a success rate of 38.67% compared to Kirkin's 29.07%.
- Under pressure, Perego is more resilient, saving 78.57% of break points, while Kirkin manages 54.84%. How does this influence live betting? It's a key indicator of performance in critical moments.
- Over the past year, Perego has a narrow edge in match wins with 53.85%, compared to Kirkin's 51.85%, suggesting a slight overall performance advantage.
- Both players perform best on clay, with Perego winning 63% of matches and Kirkin 62%. Kirkin, however, struggles on grass with only a 33% win rate.
- In terms of competition level, Perego has mostly competed in Futures/ITF $10K events, winning 53.85%, while Kirkin participated in higher-level Challenger/ITF events, with a 40% win rate.
- Against stronger opponents, Perego has faced an average opponent rank of 301.69, higher than Kirkin's 403.48, indicating potentially tougher matches.
- In deciding sets, Kirkin performs robustly, winning 55% of the time compared to Perego's 33%. How does this affect predictions? It's crucial when matches are tightly contested.
- Perego converts breakpoints at a 45.45% rate, significantly higher than Kirkin’s 34.25%, which highlights his effectiveness at key points in matches.
Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):
Perego's recent form indicates stronger performance in critical areas such as second serve points won and first-serve return stats. These are essential metrics that frequently determine match outcomes in head-to-head situations.
Moreover, his ability to save breakpoints and convert them more effectively than his opponent underlines his skill in clutch situations. This can be a decisive factor when matches are closely contested.
Although Kirkin has demonstrated resilience in deciding sets, Perego's overall stronger statistics and tougher competition faced over the past year give him an edge.
Therefore, taking into account Perego's superior performance metrics and experience against higher-ranked opponents, he is most likely to come out as the winner in this forthcoming tennis matchup.
Ergi Kirkin vs Giulio Perego Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Kirkin vs G. Perego H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 16 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:57:14 | Average Match Time | 2:57:14 |
| 56% (57/102) | 1st Serve % | 64% (69/107) |
| 67% (38/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (55/69) |
| 51% (23/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (10/38) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (4/4) |
| 39% (42/107) | Return Points Win % | 40% (41/102) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Kirkin Recent Matches Played
G. Perego Recent Matches Played

E. Kirkin vs G. Perego Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.25% (285/196) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.76% (49/33) |
| 55.84% (631/499) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.16% (113/78) |
| 52.07% (5473/5037) | Games Win/Loss | 53.24% (1001/879) |
| 58.46% (76/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.00% (11/9) |
| 62.13% (187/114) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.29% (38/24) |
| 44.68% (21/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1241 | Aces Total | 159 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1198 | Total Double Faults | 116 |
| 1:42:35 | Average Match Time | 1:10:28 |
| 478.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 275.23 |
| 57% (18658/32657) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2227/3489) |
| 66% (12384/18658) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1460/2227) |
| 48% (6726/14008) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (640/1262) |
| 47% (1692/3608) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (154/349) |
| 43% (13874/32415) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1392/3456) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.90% (84/99) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69.47% (198/87) | Futures W/L | 59.76% (49/33) |
| 59% (278/474) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (48/81) |
| 100% (5/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (69/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (13/22) |
| 62% (102/165) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (12/28) |
| 89% (244/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (51/43) |
| 11% (244/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (51/7) |
| 29% (237/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (31/5) |